No Steal, but Turnover
2010.07.20 09:25
Green #92 taps the ball away from Red #7 while the later is dribbling. Green #33 and Red #7 competes for the loose ball and a jump ball situation is called. Green gains possession under Alternating Possession Rule.
In this play, despite being the player who taps the ball away from Red #7, Green #92 is not charged for a steal. The jump ball situation was caused by Green #33 and Red #7. Since Red lost the possession, Red #7 is charged a turnover and Green #33 is charged for a steal since he forced the jump ball situation. This is the “only time a steal can be charged when the ball goes dead“. According to the Statistician’s Manual, “when the actions of a defensive player causes a held ball to occur and his team wins possession as a result of the alternating possession rule“, a steal will be charged.
(Note, the whistle was blown before Green #7 grabs the ball and thus was not involved in this play for any statistical measures)
-
Double-sized League
2021-03-25 10:07:30 -
The Second SBL Champion
2021-01-07 12:03:37 -
A second season with two new teams
2020-09-24 10:47:30 -
Analytics Updated with more tools
2020-08-12 09:35:35 -
This day 14 years ago, we tipped off!
2020-06-25 11:02:12 -
It was started 14 years ago
2020-06-19 11:00:31 -
Locations Page is back too
2020-05-03 16:29:16 -
Analytics Updated with Player Games
2020-05-02 15:10:50 -
加油!
2020-04-03 13:00:14 -
HOOPS.HK Website Revamp
2020-03-28 22:39:30